Compare
Barossa vs Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 75 km apart · Barossa profile · Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray profile
Barossa Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray
Barossa and Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray are two South Australian regions with different levels of accessibility and income. In Barossa, more homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park (52.1%) and a school (37.4%) compared to Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray, where these figures are 36.4% and 25.7%. First Nations households in Barossa also have a far higher typical income of $1,805, while the typical income in Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray is $1,023. Additionally, the First Nations unemployment rate is well higher in Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray at 15.2%, compared to 10.0% in Barossa.
Both areas share a very similar profile for their First Nations residents, who have the same typical age of 22. This shared youth is seen across both regions, though they differ in their local layouts. Barossa's street connectivity is far higher, and more of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and public transport. While both are mostly car-dependent, Barossa has a slightly higher walkability score than Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Barossa with nearby areas
Compare Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Barossa vs Loxton - Waikerie - Mid Murray [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE401003/barossa/vs/IARE401010/loxton-waikerie-mid-murray