Compare
Nanango - Kilkivan vs South Burnett
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 74 km apart · Nanango - Kilkivan profile · South Burnett profile
Nanango - Kilkivan South Burnett
Nanango - Kilkivan and South Burnett are two rural Queensland areas with distinct differences in local access and outcomes for First Nations people. South Burnett has much better access to local services, with 48.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park compared to 28.1% in Nanango - Kilkivan. In South Burnett, First Nations Year 12 completion is 37.4%, which is far higher than the 25.9% seen in Nanango - Kilkivan. This gap is also seen in typical First Nations household incomes, which are well higher in South Burnett at $1,371 compared to $1,021 in Nanango - Kilkivan.
Both areas are very similar when it comes to public transport, with 0.0% of homes within a 10-minute walk of a stop. While South Burnett is generally more accessible, with a walkability score of 2.1 (mostly car-dependent), Nanango - Kilkivan is slightly more remote at 1.4 (car-dependent). The two areas also differ in their First Nations populations; the typical person is noticeably older in Nanango - Kilkivan at 27, while in South Burnett they are 20.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Nanango - Kilkivan with nearby areas
Compare South Burnett with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Nanango - Kilkivan vs South Burnett [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE306011/nanango-kilkivan/vs/IARE306013/south-burnett