Compare
Brimbank vs Wyndham - Altona
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 23 km apart · Brimbank profile · Wyndham - Altona profile
Brimbank Wyndham - Altona
Brimbank and Wyndham - Altona are two nearby Victorian areas with different levels of accessibility. Brimbank is more walkable, with a score of 6.6 (very walkable) compared to 6.0 (somewhat walkable) in Wyndham - Altona. This is seen in the layout, as Brimbank has far more street intersections per square kilometre (279 versus 124) and a far higher share of homes with a 15-minute-city walkshed (84.5% versus 71.3%). Wyndham - Altona has a far larger First Nations population, with 3,131 people compared to 853 in Brimbank, and the typical personal income for First Nations people there is well higher at $689.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011 in their commitment to green space, as almost all homes in both places are within a 15-minute walk of a park. They also share a nearly identical rate of Year 12 completion for First Nations residents, at around 40%. While Brimbank generally has better access to groceries and health services by foot, Wyndham - Altona has a larger share of parks as its most common walkable amenity.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Brimbank with nearby areas
Compare Wyndham - Altona with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Brimbank vs Wyndham - Altona [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE201001/brimbank/vs/IARE201019/wyndham-altona