Compare
Tumut vs Gippsland
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 212 km apart · Tumut profile · Gippsland profile
Tumut Gippsland
Tumut and Gippsland are both regional areas, but they offer different levels of local access. Tumut is more walkable for daily needs, with 64.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school compared to 41.6% in Gippsland. This accessibility extends to parks, where Tumut's share of homes within a 15-minute walk is far higher at 75.5% versus 59.0% in Gippsland. In contrast, Gippsland provides better access to transit, with 45.3% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport, far higher than the 23.9% seen in Tumut.
These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011, and they share very similar economic profiles for First Nations residents. Typical personal incomes for First Nations people are almost identical in both places, at $534 in Gippsland and $529 in Tumut. While Gippsland has a far larger First Nations population with 2,607 people, Tumut has a well higher share of people who speak a First Nations language at 7.2%.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Tumut with nearby areas
Compare Gippsland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Tumut vs Gippsland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE105019/tumut/vs/IARE202007/gippsland