Compare
Lithgow - Oberon vs Baulkham Hills
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 82 km apart · Lithgow - Oberon profile · Baulkham Hills profile
Lithgow - Oberon Baulkham Hills
Lithgow - Oberon and Baulkham Hills are very different environments. Baulkham Hills is much more accessible, with 93.3% of homes within a 10 minute walk of public transport and 92.4% within a 15 minute walk of a park. By contrast, only 59.8% of homes in Lithgow - Oberon are near public transport and 67.3% are near a park. These differences extend to First Nations outcomes; for example, 54.0% of First Nations people in Baulkham Hills finished Year 12, compared to 23.5% in Lithgow - Oberon.
Both areas share a similar landscape, with a mean terrain slope of about 8%. While they are similar in this way, they differ in how people move around. Baulkham Hills has a much higher street connectivity score of 47, while Lithgow - Oberon has a score of 1. This is consistent with the higher walkability score in Baulkham Hills, although both are considered somewhat walkable.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Lithgow - Oberon with nearby areas
Compare Baulkham Hills with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lithgow - Oberon vs Baulkham Hills [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE105015/lithgow-oberon/vs/IARE107002/baulkham-hills