Compare
Gloucester - Dungog vs Port Macquarie - Hastings
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 93 km apart · Gloucester - Dungog profile · Port Macquarie - Hastings profile
Gloucester - Dungog Port Macquarie - Hastings
Gloucester - Dungog and Port Macquarie - Hastings are two regional New South Wales areas with very different levels of accessibility. Port Macquarie - Hastings is far more walkable, with a score of 4.6 (somewhat walkable) compared to 2.6 (mostly car-dependent) in Gloucester - Dungog. This is seen in the distance to essential services; for example, 68.2% of homes in Port Macquarie - Hastings are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, compared to just 24.9% in Gloucester - Dungog. Port Macquarie - Hastings also has a far larger First Nations population, with 4,730 people, and a higher rate of First Nations Year 12 completion at 37.5%, while Gloucester - Dungog sits at 26.3%.
First Nations household incomes are almost identical in both areas, sitting at $1,478 in Gloucester - Dungog and $1,519 in Port Macquarie - Hastings. While they share this economic similarity, other trends differ. First Nations residents are noticeably older in Gloucester - Dungog, where the typical age is 25, compared to 22 in Port Macquarie - Hastings.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Gloucester - Dungog with nearby areas
Compare Port Macquarie - Hastings with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gloucester - Dungog vs Port Macquarie - Hastings [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE104006/gloucester-dungog/vs/IARE104015/port-macquarie-hastings