Compare
Goldstein vs Isaacs
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 18 km apart · Goldstein profile · Isaacs profile
Goldstein Isaacs
Isaacs and Goldstein are nearby Victorian areas with very different lifestyles. Goldstein is a more affluent and walkable hub, where 44.8% of adults hold a university degree and typical weekly family incomes are $3,194. In contrast, Isaacs is more car-dependent, with a longer drive time to the city (35 minutes compared to 15 minutes in Goldstein) and a lower share of university graduates at 30.4%. Goldstein also has a much higher proportion of people working from home at 42.1%, while in Isaacs, this figure is 29.5%.
Everyday life is quite similar in both places when it comes to home size, the number of children per area, and the share of people with long-term health conditions. However, the gap between them is shifting; since 2011, the typical resident in Goldstein has become noticeably older than those in Isaacs, and the difference in high-income households has narrowed. While both areas sit above the national figure for family income, Goldstein is far more concentrated at the top end.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 189,518
- First area, 2016: 194,692
- First area, 2021: 154,736
- Second area, 2011: 129,439
- Second area, 2016: 145,399
- Second area, 2021: 160,526
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Goldstein: 1.1% males, 2.0% females; 85+ in Isaacs: 0.9% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Goldstein: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Isaacs: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Goldstein: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Isaacs: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Goldstein: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Isaacs: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Goldstein: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Isaacs: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Goldstein: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Isaacs: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Goldstein: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Isaacs: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Goldstein: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Isaacs: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Goldstein: 3.5% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Isaacs: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Goldstein: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Isaacs: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Goldstein: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Isaacs: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Goldstein: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Isaacs: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Goldstein: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Isaacs: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Goldstein: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Isaacs: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Goldstein: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Isaacs: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Goldstein: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Isaacs: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Goldstein: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Isaacs: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Goldstein: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Isaacs: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $523
- First area, 2016: $611
- First area, 2021: $1,068
- Second area, 2011: $770
- Second area, 2016: $861
- Second area, 2021: $891
- First area, 2011: $1,326
- First area, 2016: $1,475
- First area, 2021: $2,377
- Second area, 2011: $1,848
- Second area, 2016: $2,035
- Second area, 2021: $1,966
- First area, 2011: $1,408
- First area, 2016: $1,586
- First area, 2021: $3,194
- Second area, 2011: $2,473
- Second area, 2016: $2,598
- Second area, 2021: $2,440
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $290
- First area, 2016: $301
- First area, 2021: $490
- Second area, 2011: $361
- Second area, 2016: $401
- Second area, 2021: $406
- First area, 2011: $1,770
- First area, 2016: $1,700
- First area, 2021: $2,800
- Second area, 2011: $2,400
- Second area, 2016: $2,500
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Goldstein with nearby areas
Compare Isaacs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Goldstein vs Isaacs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED217/goldstein/vs/CED224/isaacs