Compare
Kingsford Smith vs Watson
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 15 km apart · Kingsford Smith profile · Watson profile
Kingsford Smith Watson
Watson and Kingsford Smith are both large, densely populated areas in Greater Sydney, but they differ sharply in wealth and cultural makeup. Watson is far more linguistically diverse, with 62.8% of people using another language at home, compared to 34.2% in Kingsford Smith. This is consistent with Watson having a much higher share of people who speak little or no English (13.8%). In contrast, Kingsford Smith is wealthier; the typical weekly personal income there is $1,042, which is far higher than the $626 seen in Watson. Kingsford Smith also has a more qualified workforce, with 40.2% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 26.6% in Watson.
Both areas are nearly identical in their basic layout and age profile, with the typical resident in each being 36 years old. They also share a high level of convenience, as almost every home in both areas is within a 10-minute walk of public transport. While they share these structural similarities, the financial gap has widened over time; the difference in typical weekly household income has grown from $205 in 2011 to $653 today.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 138,388
- First area, 2016: 176,238
- First area, 2021: 181,933
- Second area, 2011: 133,442
- Second area, 2016: 174,806
- Second area, 2021: 183,154
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kingsford Smith: 0.8% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Watson: 0.9% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Kingsford Smith: 0.9% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Watson: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Kingsford Smith: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Watson: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Kingsford Smith: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Watson: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Kingsford Smith: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Watson: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Kingsford Smith: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Watson: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Kingsford Smith: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Watson: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Kingsford Smith: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Watson: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Kingsford Smith: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Watson: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Kingsford Smith: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Watson: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Kingsford Smith: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Watson: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Kingsford Smith: 5.0% males, 5.0% females; 30–34 in Watson: 4.1% males, 3.8% females
- 25–29 in Kingsford Smith: 5.0% males, 5.2% females; 25–29 in Watson: 4.4% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Kingsford Smith: 4.0% males, 3.9% females; 20–24 in Watson: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Kingsford Smith: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Watson: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Kingsford Smith: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Watson: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Kingsford Smith: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Watson: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Kingsford Smith: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Watson: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $534
- First area, 2016: $777
- First area, 2021: $1,042
- Second area, 2011: $468
- Second area, 2016: $490
- Second area, 2021: $626
- First area, 2011: $1,221
- First area, 2016: $1,794
- First area, 2021: $2,196
- Second area, 2011: $1,016
- Second area, 2016: $1,281
- Second area, 2021: $1,543
- First area, 2011: $1,480
- First area, 2016: $2,235
- First area, 2021: $2,725
- Second area, 2011: $1,257
- Second area, 2016: $1,391
- Second area, 2021: $1,745
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $235
- First area, 2016: $530
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2011: $234
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $2,520
- First area, 2021: $2,870
- Second area, 2011: $1,800
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kingsford Smith with nearby areas
Compare Watson with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kingsford Smith vs Watson [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED122/kingsford-smith/vs/CED144/watson