Compare
Blaxland vs Mitchell
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 18 km apart · Blaxland profile · Mitchell profile
Blaxland Mitchell
Blaxland and Mitchell are two large, populous areas in New South Wales with very different profiles. Blaxland is much more linguistically and culturally diverse, with 67.2% of people using a language other than English at home and 16.7% speaking little or no English. In contrast, Mitchell has a much more affluent workforce; the typical weekly household income is $2,715, far higher than the $1,452 typical in Blaxland. Mitchell also has a higher share of university qualifications, with 40.8% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 20.4% in Blaxland.
Both areas are almost identical in their share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, which is 0.6% for each. While they share similar population sizes and a similar number of public transport stops, they have drifted apart over time. Gaps in typical income, home ownership and education have all widened since 2011. While Blaxland is more walkable for daily needs, Mitchell has seen a much larger increase in people working from home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 158,408
- First area, 2016: 174,634
- First area, 2021: 188,607
- Second area, 2011: 143,452
- Second area, 2016: 153,449
- Second area, 2021: 188,212
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Blaxland: 0.7% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Mitchell: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Blaxland: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Mitchell: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Blaxland: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Mitchell: 1.4% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Blaxland: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Mitchell: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Blaxland: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Mitchell: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Blaxland: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Mitchell: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Blaxland: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Mitchell: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Blaxland: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Mitchell: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Blaxland: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Mitchell: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in Blaxland: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Mitchell: 4.1% males, 4.3% females
- 35–39 in Blaxland: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Mitchell: 3.9% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Blaxland: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Mitchell: 2.6% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Blaxland: 4.6% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in Mitchell: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Blaxland: 4.4% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Mitchell: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Blaxland: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Mitchell: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Blaxland: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Mitchell: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Blaxland: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Mitchell: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Blaxland: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Mitchell: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $385
- First area, 2016: $462
- First area, 2021: $556
- Second area, 2011: $470
- Second area, 2016: $821
- Second area, 2021: $1,026
- First area, 2011: $964
- First area, 2016: $1,222
- First area, 2021: $1,452
- Second area, 2011: $1,289
- Second area, 2016: $2,268
- Second area, 2021: $2,715
- First area, 2011: $1,079
- First area, 2016: $1,285
- First area, 2021: $1,544
- Second area, 2011: $1,357
- Second area, 2016: $2,400
- Second area, 2021: $2,928
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.2
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $300
- First area, 2016: $390
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $320
- Second area, 2016: $550
- Second area, 2021: $560
- First area, 2011: $1,935
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $2,110
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,500
- Second area, 2021: $2,990
- First area, 2011: 1.30
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.10
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Blaxland with nearby areas
Compare Mitchell with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blaxland vs Mitchell [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED105/blaxland/vs/CED129/mitchell