Fingal · Urban Centre

Walkability in Fingal

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Not a single home in Fingal (L) meets the 15-minute-city test, as no household is within a short walk of five or more key amenities. This makes the area mostly car-dependent, with a walkability score of 2.8, which is far below the Tasmanian figure of 4.7.

Open map →
📍 Fingal, Urban Centre

Where Fingal sits — Walkability score

2.8 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Fingal — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Fingal2.8
7214, TAS 1.6
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Fingal by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

A typical 15-minute walk from home in Fingal (L) reaches only 3.2 amenity types, well below the 4.5 found across Tasmania. This lack of local options is reflected in the area's low walkability score of 2.8.

2.8

Mostly car-dependent of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.2

Lower than 68% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

0.0%

Lower than 99% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

While 80.5% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, others are far less accessible; no homes are within that distance of a school, grocery store, or health service. Public transport is closer for some, with 65.5% of homes within a 10-minute walk, though this is still well below the state average.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The terrain in Fingal (L) is a little flatter than the state average, with a mean slope of 5.9%. There are 7 intersections per square kilometre, and the area provides 20 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is about the same as the Tasmanian figure.

20.0

Higher than 54% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

5.9%

Higher than 67% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Fingal

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Fingal [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL622008/fingal/topic/walkability