South Arm · Urban Centre

Walkability in South Arm

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A slope of 8.3% is about the same as the Tasmanian average, but South Arm (L) remains mostly car-dependent. While many residents can walk to a park or school, no one can reach groceries or health services within a 15-minute walk. This creates a significant gap in local convenience compared to other areas across the state.

Open map →
📍 South Arm, Urban Centre

Where South Arm sits — Walkability score

3.2 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is South Arm — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
South Arm3.2
7022, TAS 2.8
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in South Arm by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score is 3.2, meaning the area is mostly car-dependent, which is well below the Tasmanian figure of 4.7. Only 39.9% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, a result far below the state average of 53.9%.

3.2

Mostly car-dependent of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.6

Lower than 65% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

39.9%

Lower than 60% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to essentials is a major challenge, as 0% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries or health services. In contrast, 81.3% of residents can walk to a park and 57.9% can reach a school within 15 minutes, both of which are above state levels.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

There are 58 intersections per square kilometre in this area. The number of walkable amenities per 1,000 residents is 17.4, which is a little below the Tasmanian figure of 20.5.

17.4

Lower than 53% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

8.3%

Higher than 86% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for South Arm

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in South Arm [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL621025/south-arm/topic/walkability