Sorell · Urban Centre

Walkability in Sorell

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Flat terrain helps make Sorell very walkable, with a score of 6.4 that is well above the Tasmanian figure. Most people here can easily reach a range of services on foot, with 87.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a variety of amenities.

Open map →
📍 Sorell, Urban Centre

Where Sorell sits — Walkability score

6.4 Very walkable
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Sorell — very walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Sorell6.4
7172, TAS 4.9
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Sorell by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

Sorell is considered very walkable, scoring 6.4, which is well above the state's typical 4.7. Residents have better access to amenities than the state average, with 6.8 different types of services typically available within a 15-minute walk.

6.4

Very walkable of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

6.8

Higher than 88% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

87.1%

Higher than 79% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to essentials is far above the state average, especially for health services (82%) and groceries (87.3%). While 97% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, schools are the hardest to reach, with only 62.5% of homes within that same distance.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area's mean terrain slope is 4.6%, which is well below the Tasmanian average. There are 55 intersections per square kilometre, and there are 16.7 walkable amenities for every 1,000 residents, a little below the state figure.

16.7

Lower than 55% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

4.6%

Higher than 50% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Sorell

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Sorell [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL615025/sorell/topic/walkability