Saibai Island · Urban Centre

Walkability in Saibai Island

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A car-dependent walkability score of 1.0 makes Saibai Island far less walkable than the Queensland average. While most residents can easily reach a park or health clinic, no homes are within a 15-minute walk of a school, grocery store, or public transport.

Open map →
📍 Saibai Island, Urban Centre

Where Saibai Island sits — Walkability score

1.0 Car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Saibai Island — car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Saibai Island1.0
4875, QLD 2.1
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Saibai Island by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area is considered car-dependent, with a walkability score of 1.0, which is far below the Queensland figure of 5.0. No homes here have a 15-minute-city walkshed, compared to 59.1% across the state.

1.0

Car-dependent of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

1.5

Lower than 87% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

0.0%

Lower than 99% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to health services is a strength, with 66.0% of homes within 15 minutes, far above the state average. However, this contrasts with a total lack of nearby groceries, schools, or public transport, all of which are far below Queensland levels.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The terrain is quite flat with a mean slope of 2.4%, well below the Queensland figure of 6.0%. There are 11.8 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is a little below the state average, and there are 0 intersections per square kilometre.

11.8

Lower than 72% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

2.4%

Lower than 92% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Saibai Island

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Saibai Island [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL322102/saibai-island/topic/walkability