Lamb Island · Urban Centre

Walkability in Lamb Island

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Zero per cent of homes in Lamb Island meet the 15-minute-city test, meaning no one can reach five of the eight key amenity types on foot. This is a car-dependent area where residents have almost no local services within walking distance, with a walkability score of 1.4 that is far below the Queensland figure.

Open map →
📍 Lamb Island, Urban Centre

Where Lamb Island sits — Walkability score

1.4 Car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Lamb Island — car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Lamb Island1.4
4184, QLD 1.9
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Lamb Island by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area is car-dependent, with only 1.4 types of amenities within a 15-minute walk compared to 4.8 across Queensland. This reflects a huge gap in accessibility, as no homes in the area have a 15-minute-city walkshed.

1.4

Car-dependent of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

1.4

Lower than 87% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

0.0%

Lower than 99% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

While 81.7% of homes are within 15 minutes of a park, no homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, schools or health services. Public transport is also limited, with only 28.7% of homes located within a 10-minute walk of a stop, far below the state figure.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The terrain slope is 6.9%, which is about the same as the Queensland average. There are 46 intersections per square kilometre, but the number of walkable amenities per 1,000 residents is far below the state figure at just 2.0.

2.0

Lower than 96% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.9%

Higher than 76% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Lamb Island

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Lamb Island [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL321066/lamb-island/topic/walkability