Kureelpa · Urban Centre

Walkability in Kureelpa

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Far fewer amenities are within walking distance in Kureelpa than in other Queensland areas, leaving it car-dependent. The area has a walkability score of 0.2, and no homes here have a 15-minute-city walkshed. This makes it much harder to get around on foot than in most parts of the state.

Open map →
📍 Kureelpa, Urban Centre

Where Kureelpa sits — Walkability score

0.2 Car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Kureelpa — car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Kureelpa0.2
4560, QLD 4.0
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Kureelpa by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score of 0.2 means Kureelpa is car-dependent, which is far below the Queensland figure of 5.0. On average, there are only 0.3 amenity types within a 15-minute walk, compared to 4.8 across the state.

0.2

Car-dependent of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

0.3

Lower than 97% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

0.0%

Lower than 99% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Daily needs are mostly out of reach, with 0% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services, or public transport. While 20.6% of homes can reach a school within 15 minutes, 100% of residents live more than 30 minutes away from the nearest shop or health clinic.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

Steep terrain makes walking harder here, with a mean slope of 12.5%, which is well above the Queensland figure of 6.0%. There are 2 intersections per square kilometre and 3.1 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, far below the state figure of 13.4.

3.1

Lower than 94% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

12.5%

Higher than 96% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Kureelpa

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Kureelpa [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL321063/kureelpa/topic/walkability