Dangar Island · Urban Centre

Walkability in Dangar Island

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

More than 85% of homes in Dangar Island pass the 15-minute-city test, which is far above the New South Wales figure. Despite this, the area is only somewhat walkable, as it has far fewer types of amenities within reach than the state average. This creates a contrast where most people can walk to some services, but options are very limited.

Open map →
📍 Dangar Island, Urban Centre

Where Dangar Island sits — Walkability score

4.7 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Dangar Island — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Dangar Island4.7
2083, NSW 3.2
New South Wales 6.2

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Dangar Island by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score is 4.7, making it somewhat walkable and well below the New South Wales figure of 6.2. While many homes have a 15-minute walkshed, the typical resident can only reach about 4.6 different types of amenities on foot.

4.7

Somewhat walkable of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.6

Lower than 51% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

85.3%

Higher than 77% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Every home is within a 15-minute walk of a park and 88.5% can reach groceries, both of which are far above state levels. However, no homes are within 15 minutes of a school or health service, and public transport access is far below the New South Wales figure.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

Steep terrain is a major feature here, with a mean slope of 23.8%, which is far above the state average. The area has 54 intersections per square kilometre and provides 28.8 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, far above the New South Wales figure.

28.8

Higher than 72% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

23.8%

Higher than 99% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Dangar Island

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Dangar Island [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL122047/dangar-island/topic/walkability