Cudal · Urban Centre

Walkability in Cudal

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Flatter than the state average helps Cudal (L) stay somewhat walkable, though basic services remain out of reach. While nearly every home is within a 15-minute walk of a school and a park, the area lacks local groceries and health services.

Open map →
📍 Cudal, Urban Centre

Where Cudal sits — Walkability score

5.3 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.3: 67 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 47 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 42 areas
  • 0.9–1.1: 49 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 52 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 48 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 50 areas
  • 2.0–2.3: 49 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 57 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 51 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 67 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 64 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 71 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 96 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 85 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 89 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 105 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 100 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 105 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 124 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 100 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 92 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 66 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 56 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 32 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 19 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 9 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 6 areas

All urban centre areas, 2021. The marker is Cudal — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Cudal5.3
2864, NSW 2.7
New South Wales 6.2

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Cudal by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

A walkability score of 5.3 means the area is somewhat walkable, which is a little below the New South Wales figure. Almost all homes (98.7%) have a 15-minute-city walkshed, far above the state average of 71.9%.

5.3

Somewhat walkable of urban centre areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

5.9

Higher than 74% of urban centre areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

98.7%

Higher than 98% of urban centre areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Walking to schools and parks is easy, with 98.7% of homes within 15 minutes of both, far above state levels. However, access to basics is a major gap, as no homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries or health services.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The mean terrain slope is 3.8%, which is well below the state figure. There are 42 intersections per square kilometre and 50.5 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, far above the New South Wales average.

50.5

Higher than 88% of urban centre areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

3.8%

Lower than 64% of urban centre areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Cudal

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Cudal [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ucl/UCL122043/cudal/topic/walkability