Franklin (Rumney) · State Electorate

Walkability in Franklin (Rumney)

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A gentle slope of 8.2% defines the landscape of Franklin (Rumney), where the area is considered somewhat walkable. While many people can easily reach parks and transport, fewer than half of local homes have a 15-minute walk to a variety of essential services.

Open map →
📍 Franklin (Rumney), State Electorate

Where Franklin (Rumney) sits — Walkability score

4.3 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 2 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 4 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 8 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 8 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 14 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 21 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 12 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 21 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 19 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 34 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 22 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 24 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 26 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 33 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 29 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 21 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 25 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 25 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 28 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 18 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 13 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 9 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 11 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All state electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Franklin (Rumney) — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Franklin (Rumney)4.3
Greater Hobart 5.6
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Franklin (Rumney) by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area's walkability score is 4.3, which is a little below the Tasmanian figure of 4.7. Only 46.7% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, a result well below the state average of 53.9%.

4.3

Somewhat walkable of state electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.1

Lower than 73% of state electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

46.7%

Lower than 73% of state electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Walking to a park or public transport is common, with 84.7% and 75.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk, both well above state figures. In contrast, access to essentials is harder, as health services are the least accessible amenity for 35.1% of residents.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

There are 17 intersections per square kilometre and 24.7 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is a little above the Tasmanian figure of 20.5.

24.7

Higher than 89% of state electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

8.2%

Higher than 87% of state electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Franklin (Rumney)

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Franklin (Rumney) [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sed/SED60414/franklin/topic/walkability