Franklin (Nelson) · State Electorate

Walkability in Franklin (Nelson)

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A very walkable environment defines Franklin (Nelson), where 77% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed. This is far above the Tasmanian figure of 53.9%, making the area stand out for how easily residents can reach daily needs on foot.

Open map →
📍 Franklin (Nelson), State Electorate

Where Franklin (Nelson) sits — Walkability score

6.1 Very walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 2 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 4 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 8 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 8 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 14 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 21 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 12 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 21 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 19 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 34 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 22 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 24 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 26 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 33 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 29 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 21 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 25 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 25 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 28 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 18 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 13 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 9 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 11 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All state electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Franklin (Nelson) — very walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Franklin (Nelson)6.1
Greater Hobart 5.6
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Franklin (Nelson) by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area is rated as very walkable with a score of 6.1, which is well above the Tasmanian figure of 4.7. Residents typically have 6 types of amenities within a 15-minute walk, compared to 4.5 across the state.

6.1

Very walkable of state electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

6.0

Higher than 60% of state electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

77.0%

Higher than 60% of state electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Almost every home is within a 15-minute walk of a park, and 88.2% are near public transport, both far above state figures. While access to parks and transport is strongest, health services are the least accessible amenity, though still far above the state average.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The local terrain has a mean slope of 10.1%, which is a little above the Tasmanian average of 8.8%. There are 82 street intersections per square kilometre, with 17.4 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, a little below the state figure.

17.4

Higher than 70% of state electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

10.1%

Higher than 96% of state electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Franklin (Nelson)

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Franklin (Nelson) [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sed/SED60410/franklin/topic/walkability