Bass (Windermere) · State Electorate

Walkability in Bass (Windermere)

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A slightly flatter terrain than the state average helps Bass (Windermere) stay somewhat walkable, with a score of 5.1. Most homes here have good access to daily needs, and over 60% of residents can reach a variety of amenities within a 15-minute walk.

Open map →
📍 Bass (Windermere), State Electorate

Where Bass (Windermere) sits — Walkability score

5.1 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 2 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 4 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 8 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 8 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 14 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 21 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 12 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 21 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 19 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 34 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 22 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 24 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 26 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 33 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 29 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 21 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 25 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 25 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 28 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 18 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 13 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 9 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 11 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All state electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Bass (Windermere) — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Bass (Windermere)5.1
Rest of Tas. 4.1
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Bass (Windermere) by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area's walkability score is 5.1, which is considered somewhat walkable and a little above the Tasmanian figure of 4.7. About 60.3% of homes fall within a 15-minute-city walkshed, well above the state's 53.9%.

5.1

Somewhat walkable of state electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

5.0

Lower than 58% of state electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

60.3%

Lower than 57% of state electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Residents have great access to parks, schools, and health services, all of which are far above state levels. While 82.4% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, access to public transport is slightly lower than the state average at 68.8%.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope is 6.0%, which is a little below the Tasmanian average of 8.8%. There are 3 intersections per square kilometre, and the area has 17 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, a little below the state figure of 20.5.

17.0

Higher than 68% of state electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.0%

Higher than 63% of state electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Bass (Windermere)

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Bass (Windermere) [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sed/SED60115/bass/topic/walkability