Taylor · State Electorate

Walkability in Taylor

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A gentle terrain slope of 2.8% makes Taylor easier to traverse on foot than the South Australian average, yet the area remains mostly car-dependent. Only 38.1% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, which is far below the state figure. While many residents can easily reach parks and transport, most essential services are a long walk away.

Open map →
📍 Taylor, State Electorate

Where Taylor sits — Walkability score

3.9 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 2 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 4 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 8 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 8 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 14 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 21 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 12 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 21 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 19 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 34 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 22 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 24 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 26 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 33 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 29 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 21 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 25 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 25 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 28 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 18 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 13 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 9 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 11 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All state electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Taylor — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Taylor3.9
Greater Adelaide 6.6
South Australia 5.5

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Taylor by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Taylor is 3.9, meaning it is mostly car-dependent and well below the South Australian figure of 5.5. Residents have access to far fewer amenity types within a 15-minute walk than people in other parts of the state.

3.9

Mostly car-dependent of state electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.6

Lower than 82% of state electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

38.1%

Lower than 85% of state electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Walking to parks and public transport is common, with both being within a 10-minute walk for over 76% of homes. However, access to essentials is much lower than the state average, especially for health services and groceries, where only 13.9% and 30.4% of homes are within a 15-minute walk.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

There are 28 intersections per square kilometre in Taylor. The number of walkable amenities per 1,000 residents is 8.9, which is far below the South Australian figure of 16.3.

8.9

Lower than 94% of state electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

2.8%

Lower than 98% of state electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Taylor

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Taylor [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sed/SED40042/taylor/topic/walkability