Burdekin · State Electorate

Walkability in Burdekin

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 34% of homes in Burdekin pass the 15-minute-city test, a figure far below the Queensland average of 59.1%. This makes the area mostly car-dependent, as the typical resident has far fewer amenities within a short walk than people in other parts of the state.

Open map →
📍 Burdekin, State Electorate

Where Burdekin sits — Walkability score

2.5 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 2 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 4 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 8 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 8 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 14 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 21 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 12 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 21 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 19 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 34 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 22 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 24 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 26 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 33 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 29 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 21 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 25 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 25 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 28 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 18 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 13 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 9 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 11 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All state electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Burdekin — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Burdekin2.5
Rest of Qld 4.2
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Burdekin by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Burdekin is 2.5, which means it is mostly car-dependent. This is far below the Queensland figure of 5.0, with residents accessing far fewer amenity types within a 15-minute walk.

2.5

Mostly car-dependent of state electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.0

Lower than 90% of state electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

34.0%

Lower than 88% of state electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Parks are the easiest to reach, with 63% of homes within a 15-minute walk, but health services are much harder to access. Public transport is entirely unavailable on foot, as 100% of homes are more than a 30-minute walk from a stop.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The terrain is a little flatter than the Queensland average, with a mean slope of 3.5%. There are 16.5 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, though street connectivity is 0.

16.5

Higher than 65% of state electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

3.5%

Lower than 84% of state electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Burdekin

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Burdekin [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sed/SED30011/burdekin/topic/walkability