Gleneagle · Suburb / Locality

Walkability in Gleneagle

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Far fewer people can reach daily needs on foot in Gleneagle than in other Queensland areas, with a walkability score of 1.2 marking it as car-dependent. While 80.8% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, almost no one can walk to health services or a school.

Open map →
📍 Gleneagle, Suburb / Locality

Where Gleneagle sits — Walkability score

1.2 Car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 7643 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 936 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 607 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 409 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 339 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 286 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 268 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 253 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 267 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 273 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 281 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 291 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 311 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 280 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 308 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 296 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 271 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 257 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 245 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 204 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 211 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 167 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 188 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 145 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 126 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 95 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 62 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 23 areas

All suburb / locality areas, 2021. The marker is Gleneagle — car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Gleneagle1.2
4285, QLD 2.1
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Gleneagle by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area is car-dependent, with a walkability score of 1.2, which is far below the Queensland figure of 5.0. None of the homes here have a 15-minute-city walkshed, a result far below the state average of 59.1%.

1.2

Car-dependent of suburb / locality areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

0.9

Higher than 58% of suburb / locality areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

0.0%

Lower than 99% of suburb / locality areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to essentials is very limited; only 3% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport and 4% can reach groceries within 15 minutes. These gaps are far below state figures, where typically 63.7% of homes are near transport and 60.6% are near shops.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

There are 4 intersections per square kilometre and the typical terrain slope is 5.7%, which is about the same as the Queensland average. With only 6.6 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, this is far below the state figure of 13.4.

6.6

Lower than 67% of suburb / locality areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

5.7%

Higher than 50% of suburb / locality areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Gleneagle

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Gleneagle [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sal/SAL31158/gleneagle/topic/walkability