Bluewater Park · Suburb / Locality

Walkability in Bluewater Park

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Almost no one in Bluewater Park can walk to basic services, as the area is completely car-dependent. With a walkability score of 0.2, it sits far below the Queensland figure of 5.0, meaning residents must rely on vehicles for nearly every trip.

Open map →
📍 Bluewater Park, Suburb / Locality

Where Bluewater Park sits — Walkability score

0.2 Car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 7643 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 936 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 607 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 409 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 339 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 286 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 268 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 253 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 267 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 273 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 281 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 291 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 311 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 280 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 308 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 296 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 271 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 257 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 245 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 204 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 211 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 167 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 188 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 145 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 126 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 95 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 62 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 23 areas

All suburb / locality areas, 2021. The marker is Bluewater Park — car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Bluewater Park0.2
4818, QLD 2.2
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Bluewater Park by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

No homes in the area have a 15-minute-city walkshed, which is far below the Queensland figure of 59.1%. On average, there are only 0.2 amenity types within a 15-minute walk, a result far below the state average of 4.8.

0.2

Car-dependent of suburb / locality areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

0.2

Lower than 55% of suburb / locality areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

0.0%

Lower than 99% of suburb / locality areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

While 23.4% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, no one can walk to public transport, schools, groceries, or health services. In fact, 100% of homes are more than a 30-minute walk from the nearest shop, school, or health clinic.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area has one intersection per square kilometre and a typical terrain slope of 3.0%, which is a little below the Queensland figure of 6.0%. There are 2.8 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is far below the state figure of 13.4.

2.8

Lower than 77% of suburb / locality areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

3.0%

Lower than 88% of suburb / locality areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Bluewater Park

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Bluewater Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sal/SAL30293/bluewater-park/topic/walkability