Botanic Ridge · Suburb / Locality

Walkability in Botanic Ridge

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 40.1% of homes in Botanic Ridge pass the 15-minute-city test, a figure far below the 74.3% seen across Victoria. While most people can easily reach a park on foot, the area is generally less walkable than the state average.

Open map →
📍 Botanic Ridge, Suburb / Locality

Where Botanic Ridge sits — Walkability score

4.2 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 7643 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 936 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 607 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 409 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 339 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 286 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 268 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 253 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 267 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 273 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 281 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 291 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 311 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 280 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 308 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 296 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 271 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 257 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 245 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 204 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 211 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 167 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 188 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 145 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 126 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 95 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 62 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 23 areas

All suburb / locality areas, 2021. The marker is Botanic Ridge — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Botanic Ridge4.2
3977, VIC 5.7
Victoria 6.4

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Botanic Ridge by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Botanic Ridge is 4.2, which means it is somewhat walkable. This is well below the Victorian figure of 6.4, and the typical resident has far fewer amenity types within a 15-minute walk than people elsewhere in the state.

4.2

Somewhat walkable of suburb / locality areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.8

Higher than 77% of suburb / locality areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

40.1%

Higher than 77% of suburb / locality areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Almost all homes (95.8%) are within a 15-minute walk of a park, but access to other needs is much lower. For example, only 40.2% of homes can reach health services on foot, and over half of all residents live more than 30 minutes away from the nearest health service or food and drink outlet.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area has 295 intersections per square kilometre, and the typical terrain slope is 4.1%, which is about the same as the Victorian average. There are 13.5 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, a little below the state figure of 15.7.

13.5

Higher than 50% of suburb / locality areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

4.1%

Lower than 70% of suburb / locality areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Botanic Ridge

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Botanic Ridge [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sal/SAL20307/botanic-ridge/topic/walkability