North East · Sub-region (SA3)

Walkability in North East

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 22.4% of homes in North East are within a 15-minute walk of health services, which is far below the state figure. This is a mostly car-dependent area where only 35.1% of residents have a good mix of amenities within a short walk, a gap far below the Tasmanian average.

Open map →
📍 North East, Sub-region (SA3)

Where North East sits — Walkability score

2.9 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 3 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 2 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 3 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 10 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 10 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 16 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 17 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 17 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 30 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 13 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 25 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 23 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 16 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 15 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 14 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 15 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 18 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 15 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 15 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 17 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 13 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 8 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 4 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All sub-region (sa3) areas, 2021. The marker is North East — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
North East2.9
Rest of Tas. 4.1
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in North East by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score is 2.9, meaning the area is mostly car-dependent. This is well below the Tasmanian figure of 4.7, and residents typically have far fewer amenity types within a 15-minute walk than people in other parts of the state.

2.9

Mostly car-dependent of sub-region (sa3) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.1

Lower than 86% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

35.1%

Lower than 84% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to everyday needs is far below state levels, particularly for schools and public transport. While 63.1% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, over half of the population lives more than 30 minutes away from health services.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope is 6.5%, which is a little below the state figure. There is 1 intersection per square kilometre, and there are 28.1 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is well above the Tasmanian figure.

28.1

Higher than 88% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.5%

Higher than 69% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for North East

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in North East [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sa3/60203/north-east/topic/walkability