Tea Tree Gully · Sub-region (SA3)

Walkability in Tea Tree Gully

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A slightly steeper terrain than the state average marks Tea Tree Gully, yet it remains very walkable. Most residents have a high level of access to daily needs, with 80.5% of homes situated within a 15-minute walk of a variety of local amenities.

Open map →
📍 Tea Tree Gully, Sub-region (SA3)

Where Tea Tree Gully sits — Walkability score

6.2 Very walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 3 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 2 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 3 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 10 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 10 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 16 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 17 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 17 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 30 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 13 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 25 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 23 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 16 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 15 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 14 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 15 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 18 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 15 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 15 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 17 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 13 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 8 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 4 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All sub-region (sa3) areas, 2021. The marker is Tea Tree Gully — very walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Tea Tree Gully6.2
Greater Adelaide 6.6
South Australia 5.5

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Tea Tree Gully by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area's walkability score is 6.2, which is a little above the South Australian figure of 5.5. On average, residents have access to 6.2 different types of amenities within a 15-minute walk.

6.2

Very walkable of sub-region (sa3) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

6.2

Higher than 68% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

80.5%

Higher than 69% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Walking access is exceptionally strong, with 98.7% of homes within 15 minutes of a park and 97% near public transport, both far above state figures. However, access to health services is the weakest point among key amenities, though 66.1% of homes are still within a 15-minute walk of a clinic.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area has 115 intersections per square kilometre, and the typical slope is 6.0%, which is a little above the state average. There are 13 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, a figure well below the South Australian average of 16.3.

13.0

Lower than 69% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.0%

Higher than 59% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Tea Tree Gully

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Tea Tree Gully [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sa3/40205/tea-tree-gully/topic/walkability