Compare
Brisbane vs Broome
Indigenous Region comparison ≈ 3,198 km apart · Brisbane profile · Broome profile
Brisbane Broome
Brisbane and Broome are both large regional areas, but they differ sharply in how people get around and their economic profiles. Brisbane is far more walkable, with a score of 5.9 (somewhat walkable) compared to Broome's 3.2 (mostly car-dependent). In Brisbane, 79.9% of homes are within a 10 minute walk of public transport, while Broome has none. There is also a significant gap in outcomes for First Nations people; the typical First Nations household in Brisbane earns $1,692, which is well higher than the $1,266 in Broome.
Both areas are almost identical in the share of homes within a 15 minute walk of a school, with Brisbane at 68.1% and Broome at 66.6%. However, Broome has a much stronger linguistic connection to First Nations culture, with 18.7% of people speaking a First Nations language compared to 5.2% in Brisbane. This contrast is reflected in employment figures, as the First Nations unemployment rate is well higher in Broome at 17.8%, while Brisbane sits at 11.2%.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Brisbane with nearby areas
Compare Broome with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Brisbane vs Broome [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ireg/IREG301/brisbane/vs/IREG501/broome