Compare
Brisbane vs Port Lincoln - Ceduna
Indigenous Region comparison ≈ 2,104 km apart · Brisbane profile · Port Lincoln - Ceduna profile
Brisbane Port Lincoln - Ceduna
Brisbane and Port Lincoln - Ceduna are two very different regions located over 2,000 km apart. Brisbane is more walkable, with a score of 5.9 (somewhat walkable), while Port Lincoln - Ceduna is 2.9 (mostly car-dependent). Life in Brisbane is more connected, as 79.9% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport compared to 31.0% in Port Lincoln - Ceduna. There are also significant differences for First Nations people; those in Brisbane typically earn a household income of $1,692, which is well higher than the $1,135 seen in Port Lincoln - Ceduna.
These gaps in access and income have remained steady or widened over time. While Brisbane has far more First Nations people, Port Lincoln - Ceduna has a much stronger connection to traditional language, with 23.9% of people speaking a First Nations language compared to 5.2% in Brisbane. Education outcomes also differ, with First Nations Year 12 completion far higher in Brisbane at 49.6%, while Port Lincoln - Ceduna sits at 25.2%.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Brisbane with nearby areas
Compare Port Lincoln - Ceduna with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Brisbane vs Port Lincoln - Ceduna [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ireg/IREG301/brisbane/vs/IREG403/port-lincoln-ceduna