Outer Regional Australia · Remoteness Area

Walkability in Outer Regional Australia

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Fewer than half of all homes in Outer Regional Australia pass the 15-minute-city test, with only 40.9% of dwellings able to reach five or more amenity types on foot. This makes the area mostly car-dependent, as the typical resident has access to only 3.4 different types of amenities within a 15-minute walk.

Open map →
📍 Outer Regional Australia, Remoteness Area

Where Outer Regional Australia sits — Walkability score

3.3 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.3: 2 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 0 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 1 area
  • 0.9–1.1: 1 area
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 0 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 1 area
  • 2.0–2.3: 0 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 2 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 3 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 1 area
  • 3.1–3.4: 10 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 5 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 1 area
  • 4.0–4.3: 2 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 0 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 0 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 0 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 0 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 0 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 2 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 2 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 0 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 1 area
  • 6.9–7.1: 2 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 1 area
  • 7.4–7.7: 0 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 0 areas

All remoteness area areas, 2021. The marker is Outer Regional Australia — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Outer Regional Australia by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

A walkability score of 3.3 means the region is mostly car-dependent. Only 40.9% of homes are located within a 15-minute walk of enough essential services to meet the 15-minute-city standard.

3.3

Mostly car-dependent of remoteness area areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.4

Lower than 61% of remoteness area areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

40.9%

Lower than 57% of remoteness area areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Parks are the easiest amenity to reach, with 56.8% of homes within a 15-minute walk. In contrast, health services are the hardest to access, with only 31.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk and 54% of residents living more than 30 minutes away from the nearest one.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope across the region is 6.0%. There are 20.6 walkable amenities for every 1,000 residents, and the street connectivity is 0 intersections per square kilometre.

20.6

Higher than 50% of remoteness area areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.0%

Higher than 71% of remoteness area areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Outer Regional Australia

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Outer Regional Australia [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ra/RA12/outer-regional-australia/topic/walkability